← Back to context

Comment by SkipperCat

12 days ago

Fair point, but America is getting rid of the parts of government that provide stability across the country and world. I don't see any major changes to the US war machine.

Shutting down USAID, cutting education, health benefits and dismantling the checks on executive power do nothing to curb what criticize. These actions actually destabilize and only give greater chance that what you dislike becomes more prevalent.

[flagged]

  • A front for destabilization operations by whom? By the NSA, FBI and CIA is who. And no, none of those organizations will be held accountable for their abuses of international aid. Instead, we'll throw the baby out with the bathwater and blame the second-degree manslaughter on "state department" operations.

    USAID is not a shadowy cabal, it is not an element of the deep state. It can be corrected, even isolated from harm, by reorganizing their leadership to a board instead a administrative seat. You're just not arguing in good faith, and I really have to wonder why you're falling for talking points aimed at the lowest-intelligence voting bloc.

    • USAID absolutely is an element of the "deep state" in the countries in which it operates.

      Example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZunZuneo

      Even if without cover CIA involvement, they operates parallel social services that don't answer to a foreign government to advance a foreign governments priorities.

      Every Pakistani I talked to (living in Pakistan) has a negative view USAID and foreign NGOs. Why do you think that would be?

      1 reply →

    • Don’t accuse me of “not arguing in good faith.” My family has vastly more investment in and knowledge of USAID than most of the people reflexively defending “the institutions.” And finding out about its political activities has been red pilling.

      It’s naive to think we can clean out the NSA, FBI, and CIA. I’ll take what I can get.

      1 reply →