← Back to context

Comment by CaptWillard

9 days ago

[flagged]

What are you referring to?

  • He is making a stink about Covid vaccine requirements during a period where hospitals were overflowing and bodies were being stacked in refrigerated trailers.

    • There are no stories about this outside the first month. The hospitals were initially ill equipped but were so well equipped after March/April that the giant boat they sent as a backup to New York was barely used.

      Almost no healthy people died from COVID, most had co-morbidities and they should have been the only ones forced to vax and stay home.

    • Vaccines were a miracle. The state medical examiner converted one nearby university’s arena to a temporary morgue at one point in 2020. It’s mind boggling that people were and still are in denial about how bad it got before large parts of the population started getting vaccinated

      23 replies →

Are you referring to the most studied medicine in human history or the one that saved more lives than any other medicine in human history?

  • Maybe he is, but forcing teens to take the vaccination was still rather illiberal.

    We knew perfectly well back then that bad cases of Covid were rare in teenagers.

    • We also knew perfectly well that allowing it to spread among teenagers would make it impossible to control. When I got vaccinated it was to protect elderly friends and family, not myself.

      2 replies →

    • Doesn't matter if the cases were bad for them or not. They were still believed to be able to spread it.

      "illiberal" or not, the COVID 19 vaccination mandates were good decisions that saved countless lives.

  • I'm referring to the medicine deployed against a pandemic whose death count is still entirely unknown.

    How many people died because of COVID?

    You don't know. No one knows.

    Meanwhile, everyone who knows better pretends that the most fundamental data about the subject, on top of which all other data and decsions were built ... is garbage.

    • Do you think the rough death toll of pandemics are fundamentally unknowable to some approximation? Do you think the massive increase in mortality during the pandemic was a coincidence?

      5 replies →

    • This is what statistics is for? We rarely ever “know” (in the sense of your restrictive epistemology) the precise value of ANY demographic measure.

      We don’t know how many people live in the United States at any particular moment, but the Census is still useful.

      2 replies →

    • Ah yes, because we don't have the exact numbers your appeal to idiocy must be normalized.

      Do you know how many people are saved by antibiotics RIGHT NOW? You don't know?! NO ONE KNOWS!

      Give me a break, we don't need to dissect every corpse to see how effective the vaccine is.

> I don't remember dissent being tolerated, let alone encouraged.

How many people were jailed or disappeared for their dissent?

Being able to dissent doesn't mean that people accept your opinion, it means that you are allowed to make your point using your own means.

People still get to disagree with you, point out where you are dishonest or mistaken, etc. etc. etc.

The idea that dissent wasn't tolerated is absolute BS. It was tolerated far more than it should have been, far more accommodations were made than necessary, such as in the military, which injects people with all sorts of vaccines but somehow decided that this well-tested one didn't have to be because some people were scared.