Comment by knowaveragejoe
16 days ago
It's downvoted because it's a transparent and weak attempt to "both sides" something that's not both-sidesable.
16 days ago
It's downvoted because it's a transparent and weak attempt to "both sides" something that's not both-sidesable.
Why is it not "both-sidesable"?
Middle ground fallacy
No, I'm asking for details in this specific case. I don't have deep knowledge and understanding of the subject, so why is it no applicable in this case?
1 reply →
Imagine calling trade "not both-sidesable". You can't make this stuff up.
We're not talking about trade, we're talking about executive actions hampering trade.