The author of the article seems to accept "appeal to authority" he just wishes it was more critically refined to a point that it might somehow be justifiable.
The OP is expressing dismay at this obviously compromised position. There is no purportment or strawmen that I can detect.
The author of the article seems to accept "appeal to authority" he just wishes it was more critically refined to a point that it might somehow be justifiable.
The OP is expressing dismay at this obviously compromised position. There is no purportment or strawmen that I can detect.