Comment by 9283409232
9 days ago
Again, trojan horse. Israel is the justification being used. If it wasn't Israel it would be something else. The protest at many of these colleges were organized by Jewish students.
9 days ago
Again, trojan horse. Israel is the justification being used. If it wasn't Israel it would be something else. The protest at many of these colleges were organized by Jewish students.
These methods are typical of authoritarian regimes to crush any protests that threaten the dominant powers. We can easily see that one of the dominant powers in this authoritarian regime is Israel. (Not "the Jews", many of whom took part in the protests- but Israel and its Zionist supporters in the US).
And it is so powerful that even in the face of repression and limitations to freedom of speech that clearly go to its advantage, you don't dare to point your finger at it but claim that it's just an excuse for something different.
> And it is so powerful that even in the face of repression and limitations to freedom of speech that clearly go to its advantage, you don't dare to point your finger at it but claim that it's just an excuse for something different.
It is not that this force does not exist. It is that it is means to end, not the end itself.
> It is that it is means to end, not the end itself.
So is giving billions in aids to Israel every year, despite Israel being a rich country (and tens of billions in the last two years alone, and to bomb civilians, no less).
So is providing diplomatic cover to Israel in the UN and against institutions such as the International Criminal Court, at the cost of your own moral standing in the world.
So is passing laws punishing boycotts of Israel- which the US has done for many years, before Trump.
So is absorbing the cost of the instability caused by Israel in the Middle East and intervening in its defence every time they need it.
At what point will you start connecting the dots and realise that all these means to some different end always end up benefitting Israel, and no one else?
6 replies →