Comment by wredcoll
4 days ago
I was curious and open-minded enough to go and look up several layers of citations from the article you didn't even bother to link. It wasn't convincing.
It turns out that when people actually read your citations, sometimes they find out you're full of crap.
Arguing that women are in danger because one woman got hurt by another woman hitting a volleyball at her is ludicrously patronizing.
Hey, if you don’t want to listen to that woman, that’s fine, but maybe you might listen to these women?:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02640414.2024.2...
“The study compared current Olympic versus current Olympic Recognised sports, elite versus world class, and current versus retired Olympic sport athletes. Most athletes favoured biological sex categorisation (58%) and considered it unfair for trans women to compete in the female category, except for precision sports. This view was held most strongly by world class athletes regarding their own sport (77% unfair, 15% fair).”
There’s a conflict of rights here, and it has two sides.