Comment by SillyUsername

Well yes, but still the name should give it away and you'll be shot during PRs if you submit JS as TS :D

The fact is the training data has confused JS with TS so the LLM can't "get its head" around the semantic, not technical difference.

Also the secondary point wasn't just that it was "incorrect" it's the fact its reasoning was worthless unless it knew who to ask and the right questions to ask.

If somebody says to you something you know is right, is actually wrong, the first thing you ask them is "why do you think that?" not "maybe I should think of this from a new angle, without evidence of what is wrong".

It illustrates lack of critical thinking, and also shows you missed the point of the question. :D