← Back to context Comment by hakaneskici 2 months ago What made you think that? 5 comments hakaneskici Reply johnisgood 2 months ago The README seems like what GPT would spit out, with all the emojis, diagrams, etc.Not the first time I ran into it, but I did not bother commenting.I can recognize it from far away. Thankfully I am not the only one. hakaneskici 2 months ago I misunderstood the parent comment as if it was saying my post was AI ;)I think the readme is still well crafted, AI couldn't do this without the author. johnisgood 2 months ago A combination of LLM and author. That is not to say it is bad or negative, to be honest, so yeah you are right.If he meant your reply, I do not see any reasons as to why. :D akadeb 2 months ago The emojis are all AI. The content is a mix of me n cursor and I added the mermaid chart to make it easier to visualize the system diagram.The circuit diagram in on figmaAnd demo video edited on capcut johnisgood 2 months ago It is fine. I use LLMs to generate stuff, too, and it wouldn't have the right content without me, similarly to yours.Thanks for elaborating!
johnisgood 2 months ago The README seems like what GPT would spit out, with all the emojis, diagrams, etc.Not the first time I ran into it, but I did not bother commenting.I can recognize it from far away. Thankfully I am not the only one. hakaneskici 2 months ago I misunderstood the parent comment as if it was saying my post was AI ;)I think the readme is still well crafted, AI couldn't do this without the author. johnisgood 2 months ago A combination of LLM and author. That is not to say it is bad or negative, to be honest, so yeah you are right.If he meant your reply, I do not see any reasons as to why. :D akadeb 2 months ago The emojis are all AI. The content is a mix of me n cursor and I added the mermaid chart to make it easier to visualize the system diagram.The circuit diagram in on figmaAnd demo video edited on capcut johnisgood 2 months ago It is fine. I use LLMs to generate stuff, too, and it wouldn't have the right content without me, similarly to yours.Thanks for elaborating!
hakaneskici 2 months ago I misunderstood the parent comment as if it was saying my post was AI ;)I think the readme is still well crafted, AI couldn't do this without the author. johnisgood 2 months ago A combination of LLM and author. That is not to say it is bad or negative, to be honest, so yeah you are right.If he meant your reply, I do not see any reasons as to why. :D
johnisgood 2 months ago A combination of LLM and author. That is not to say it is bad or negative, to be honest, so yeah you are right.If he meant your reply, I do not see any reasons as to why. :D
akadeb 2 months ago The emojis are all AI. The content is a mix of me n cursor and I added the mermaid chart to make it easier to visualize the system diagram.The circuit diagram in on figmaAnd demo video edited on capcut johnisgood 2 months ago It is fine. I use LLMs to generate stuff, too, and it wouldn't have the right content without me, similarly to yours.Thanks for elaborating!
johnisgood 2 months ago It is fine. I use LLMs to generate stuff, too, and it wouldn't have the right content without me, similarly to yours.Thanks for elaborating!
The README seems like what GPT would spit out, with all the emojis, diagrams, etc.
Not the first time I ran into it, but I did not bother commenting.
I can recognize it from far away. Thankfully I am not the only one.
I misunderstood the parent comment as if it was saying my post was AI ;)
I think the readme is still well crafted, AI couldn't do this without the author.
A combination of LLM and author. That is not to say it is bad or negative, to be honest, so yeah you are right.
If he meant your reply, I do not see any reasons as to why. :D
The emojis are all AI. The content is a mix of me n cursor and I added the mermaid chart to make it easier to visualize the system diagram.
The circuit diagram in on figma
And demo video edited on capcut
It is fine. I use LLMs to generate stuff, too, and it wouldn't have the right content without me, similarly to yours.
Thanks for elaborating!