Comment by ziddoap
1 day ago
Like two lines up from your quote:
"He specifically was told that there were to be no logs or records made of the accounts created for DOGE employees"
That sure sounds like no logs.
If you don't believe the whistleblower, just say that, and skip the insulting me part (and I'll know to skip the replying to you part).
[flagged]
>You are being selective in your quotation:
Rich, coming from the person who left the sentence about logs out of their comment and then said "No where in the complaint does it allege anyone asked for an audit-less account".
>Go ahead, read it again please. You have the experience to understand what this means.
Do you get some sort of weird satisfaction out of being ridiculously condescending? Do you think it makes your argument stronger? Are you just an angry person?
>This very clearly means we aren't using the normal account-creation process which itself creates logs of account creation.
You think they requested no logs about account creation, but are cool with the logging after? What on earth would the purpose of that request be?
The request was not stated in a way that implies a point-in-time request to turn off logs solely for account creation. (And, again, that would be a completely nonsense request that accomplishes literally nothing).
Anyways, I have no interest in getting into it with someone that has to throw in little personal jabs in every comment. You can believe that the DOGE team only wanted the account creation to be exempt from logs but wanted the logs turned on immediately afterwards for god knows what reason.
[flagged]
1 reply →