Comment by ziddoap
1 day ago
>You are being selective in your quotation:
Rich, coming from the person who left the sentence about logs out of their comment and then said "No where in the complaint does it allege anyone asked for an audit-less account".
>Go ahead, read it again please. You have the experience to understand what this means.
Do you get some sort of weird satisfaction out of being ridiculously condescending? Do you think it makes your argument stronger? Are you just an angry person?
>This very clearly means we aren't using the normal account-creation process which itself creates logs of account creation.
You think they requested no logs about account creation, but are cool with the logging after? What on earth would the purpose of that request be?
The request was not stated in a way that implies a point-in-time request to turn off logs solely for account creation. (And, again, that would be a completely nonsense request that accomplishes literally nothing).
Anyways, I have no interest in getting into it with someone that has to throw in little personal jabs in every comment. You can believe that the DOGE team only wanted the account creation to be exempt from logs but wanted the logs turned on immediately afterwards for god knows what reason.
[flagged]
First it was logs weren't mentioned. Then it was, well, logs were mentioned, but only to be turned off for the account creation process. Now it is, well, it was someone else who requested it and everything is speculation.
>Try to apply your experience here and calm down a bit.
Had to get one more little jab in there, didn't you? Can't have just one comment without one.
We're not going to convince each other. Hope that in the future, for other people's sake, that you can tone down your condescension and insults. It's a really unpleasant experience trying to discuss important things with someone who can't make a point without belittling the person they are talking to.