← Back to context Comment by ryao 2 months ago I suspect this change was motivated by standards conformance. 2 comments ryao Reply fuhsnn 2 months ago The wording of GCC maintainer was "the standard doesn't require it." when they informed Linux kernel mailing list.https://lore.kernel.org/linux-toolchains/Z0hRrrNU3Q+ro2T7@tu... matheusmoreira 2 months ago Reminds me of strict aliasing. Same attitude...https://www.yodaiken.com/2018/06/07/torvalds-on-aliasing/
fuhsnn 2 months ago The wording of GCC maintainer was "the standard doesn't require it." when they informed Linux kernel mailing list.https://lore.kernel.org/linux-toolchains/Z0hRrrNU3Q+ro2T7@tu... matheusmoreira 2 months ago Reminds me of strict aliasing. Same attitude...https://www.yodaiken.com/2018/06/07/torvalds-on-aliasing/
matheusmoreira 2 months ago Reminds me of strict aliasing. Same attitude...https://www.yodaiken.com/2018/06/07/torvalds-on-aliasing/
The wording of GCC maintainer was "the standard doesn't require it." when they informed Linux kernel mailing list.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-toolchains/Z0hRrrNU3Q+ro2T7@tu...
Reminds me of strict aliasing. Same attitude...
https://www.yodaiken.com/2018/06/07/torvalds-on-aliasing/