← Back to context Comment by torarnv 11 hours ago CMake also does sequential configuration AFAIK. Is there any work to improve on that somewhere? 2 comments torarnv Reply OskarS 9 hours ago Meson and cmake in my experience are both MUCH faster though. It’s much less of an issue with these systems than with autotools. tavianator 4 hours ago Just tried reconfiguring LLVM: 27.24s user 8.71s system 99% cpu 36.218 total Admittedly the LLVM build time dwarfs the configuration time, but still. If you're only building a smaller component then the config time dominates: ninja libc 268.82s user 26.16s system 3246% cpu 9.086 total
OskarS 9 hours ago Meson and cmake in my experience are both MUCH faster though. It’s much less of an issue with these systems than with autotools. tavianator 4 hours ago Just tried reconfiguring LLVM: 27.24s user 8.71s system 99% cpu 36.218 total Admittedly the LLVM build time dwarfs the configuration time, but still. If you're only building a smaller component then the config time dominates: ninja libc 268.82s user 26.16s system 3246% cpu 9.086 total
tavianator 4 hours ago Just tried reconfiguring LLVM: 27.24s user 8.71s system 99% cpu 36.218 total Admittedly the LLVM build time dwarfs the configuration time, but still. If you're only building a smaller component then the config time dominates: ninja libc 268.82s user 26.16s system 3246% cpu 9.086 total
Meson and cmake in my experience are both MUCH faster though. It’s much less of an issue with these systems than with autotools.
Just tried reconfiguring LLVM:
Admittedly the LLVM build time dwarfs the configuration time, but still. If you're only building a smaller component then the config time dominates: