Comment by haswell
2 days ago
He mentions this in the same paragraph:
> If you’re still suspicious, try stripping EXIF by taking a screenshot and run an experiment yourself—I’ve tried this and it still works the same way.
2 days ago
He mentions this in the same paragraph:
> If you’re still suspicious, try stripping EXIF by taking a screenshot and run an experiment yourself—I’ve tried this and it still works the same way.
Why didn't he do that then for this post?
Even better, edit it and place a false location.
This is a good test - the salient point is that it is fine if the LLM is confused, or even gets it wrong! But what I suspect would happen is that it would confabulate details which aren't in the photo to justify the incorrect EXIF answer. This is not fine.
1 reply →
Because I'd already determined it wasn't using EXIF in prior experiments and didn't bother with the one that I wrote up.
I added two examples at the end just now where I stripped EXIF via screenshotting first.