I'm not sure what you're getting at. What's useful about LLMs, and especially multi-modal ones, is that that you can ask them anything and they'll answer to best of their ability (especially if well prompted). I'm not sure that o3, as a "reasoning" model is adding much value here - since there is not a whole lot of reasoning going on.
This is basically fine-grained image captioning followed by nearest neighbor search, which is certainly something you could have built as soon as decent NN-based image captioning became available, at least 10 years ago. Did anyone do it? I've no idea, although it'd seem surprising if not.
As noted, what's useful about LLMs is that they are a "generic solution", so one doesn't need to create a custom ML-based app to be able to do things like this, but I don't find much of a surprise factor in them doing well at geoguessing since this type of "fuzzy lookup" is exactly what a predict-next-token engine is designed to do.
If you forget the LLM implementation, fundamentally what you are trying to do here is first detect a bunch of features in the photo (i.e. fine-grain image captioning "in foreground a firepit with safety warning on glass, in background a model XX car parked in front of a bungalow, in distance rolling hills" etc) then do a fuzzy match of this feature set with other photos you have seen - which ones have the greatest number of things in common to the photo you are looking up? You could implement this in a custom app by creating a high-dimensional feature space embedding then looking for nearest neighbors, similar to how face recognition works.
Of course an LLM is performing this a bit differently, and with a bit more flexibility, but the starting point is going to be the same - image feature/caption extraction, which in combination then recall related training samples (both text-only, and perhaps multi-model) which are used to predict the location answer you have asked for. The flexibility of the LLM is that it isn't just treating each feature ("fire pit", "CA licence plate") as independent, but will naturally recall contexts where multiple of these occur together, but IMO not so different in that regard to high dimensional nearest neighbor search.
Did it not, or no one was interested enough to build one? I’m pretty certain there’s a database of portraits somewhere where they search id details from photograph. Automatic tagging exists for photo software. I don’t see why that can be extrapolated to landmarks with enough data.
I think you are underestimating the importance of a "world model" in the process. It is the modeling of how all these details are related to each other that is critical here.
The LLM will have an edge by being able to draw on higher level abstract concepts.
I think you are overestimating how much knowledge is o3s world model. Just because it can output something doesn't mean it's likely that it will substantially affect it's future outputs. Even just talking to it about college level algebra it seems to not understand these abstract concepts at all. I definitely don't feel the AGI I feel like it's a teenager trying to BS it's way through an essay with massive amounts of plagiarism.
You’re not playing with it on your phone. You’re accesing a service with your phone. Like saying you can use emacs on iOS when you are just ssh-ing to a remote linux box.
I'm not sure what you're getting at. What's useful about LLMs, and especially multi-modal ones, is that that you can ask them anything and they'll answer to best of their ability (especially if well prompted). I'm not sure that o3, as a "reasoning" model is adding much value here - since there is not a whole lot of reasoning going on.
This is basically fine-grained image captioning followed by nearest neighbor search, which is certainly something you could have built as soon as decent NN-based image captioning became available, at least 10 years ago. Did anyone do it? I've no idea, although it'd seem surprising if not.
As noted, what's useful about LLMs is that they are a "generic solution", so one doesn't need to create a custom ML-based app to be able to do things like this, but I don't find much of a surprise factor in them doing well at geoguessing since this type of "fuzzy lookup" is exactly what a predict-next-token engine is designed to do.
How does nearest neighbor search relate to this?
If you forget the LLM implementation, fundamentally what you are trying to do here is first detect a bunch of features in the photo (i.e. fine-grain image captioning "in foreground a firepit with safety warning on glass, in background a model XX car parked in front of a bungalow, in distance rolling hills" etc) then do a fuzzy match of this feature set with other photos you have seen - which ones have the greatest number of things in common to the photo you are looking up? You could implement this in a custom app by creating a high-dimensional feature space embedding then looking for nearest neighbors, similar to how face recognition works.
Of course an LLM is performing this a bit differently, and with a bit more flexibility, but the starting point is going to be the same - image feature/caption extraction, which in combination then recall related training samples (both text-only, and perhaps multi-model) which are used to predict the location answer you have asked for. The flexibility of the LLM is that it isn't just treating each feature ("fire pit", "CA licence plate") as independent, but will naturally recall contexts where multiple of these occur together, but IMO not so different in that regard to high dimensional nearest neighbor search.
2 replies →
So you admit that this tech is at least 2 years old publicly and likely much older privately?
Did it not, or no one was interested enough to build one? I’m pretty certain there’s a database of portraits somewhere where they search id details from photograph. Automatic tagging exists for photo software. I don’t see why that can be extrapolated to landmarks with enough data.
I think you are underestimating the importance of a "world model" in the process. It is the modeling of how all these details are related to each other that is critical here.
The LLM will have an edge by being able to draw on higher level abstract concepts.
I think you are overestimating how much knowledge is o3s world model. Just because it can output something doesn't mean it's likely that it will substantially affect it's future outputs. Even just talking to it about college level algebra it seems to not understand these abstract concepts at all. I definitely don't feel the AGI I feel like it's a teenager trying to BS it's way through an essay with massive amounts of plagiarism.
If it existed two years ago I certainly couldn't play with it on my phone.
You’re not playing with it on your phone. You’re accesing a service with your phone. Like saying you can use emacs on iOS when you are just ssh-ing to a remote linux box.