← Back to context Comment by __s 17 hours ago Even Ruby has JIT now 3 comments __s Reply creata 17 hours ago True! But pjmlp was referring specifically to advanced JIT implementations, so I wondered which JITs he was referring to as advanced. pjmlp 8 hours ago In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support). ysleepy 7 hours ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems.
creata 17 hours ago True! But pjmlp was referring specifically to advanced JIT implementations, so I wondered which JITs he was referring to as advanced. pjmlp 8 hours ago In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support). ysleepy 7 hours ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems.
pjmlp 8 hours ago In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support). ysleepy 7 hours ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems.
ysleepy 7 hours ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems.
True! But pjmlp was referring specifically to advanced JIT implementations, so I wondered which JITs he was referring to as advanced.
In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.
That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support).
If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems.