← Back to context Comment by __s 2 months ago Even Ruby has JIT now 4 comments __s Reply creata 2 months ago True! But pjmlp was referring specifically to advanced JIT implementations, so I wondered which JITs he was referring to as advanced. pjmlp 2 months ago In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support). ysleepy 2 months ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems. 1 reply →
creata 2 months ago True! But pjmlp was referring specifically to advanced JIT implementations, so I wondered which JITs he was referring to as advanced. pjmlp 2 months ago In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support). ysleepy 2 months ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems. 1 reply →
pjmlp 2 months ago In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support). ysleepy 2 months ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems. 1 reply →
ysleepy 2 months ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems. 1 reply →
True! But pjmlp was referring specifically to advanced JIT implementations, so I wondered which JITs he was referring to as advanced.
In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.
That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support).
If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems.
1 reply →