← Back to context Comment by __s 1 day ago Even Ruby has JIT now 4 comments __s Reply creata 1 day ago True! But pjmlp was referring specifically to advanced JIT implementations, so I wondered which JITs he was referring to as advanced. pjmlp 16 hours ago In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support). ysleepy 14 hours ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems. 1 reply →
creata 1 day ago True! But pjmlp was referring specifically to advanced JIT implementations, so I wondered which JITs he was referring to as advanced. pjmlp 16 hours ago In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support). ysleepy 14 hours ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems. 1 reply →
pjmlp 16 hours ago In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support). ysleepy 14 hours ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems. 1 reply →
ysleepy 14 hours ago If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems. 1 reply →
True! But pjmlp was referring specifically to advanced JIT implementations, so I wondered which JITs he was referring to as advanced.
In Ruby's case that would be RubyMotion, TruffleRubby and JRuby.
That trace back to Apple's efforts with MacRuby, or Sun's (for a while Netbeans even had Ruby support).
If you go that route, GraalPy is there too, so the argument is not as strong as it seems.
1 reply →