I would normally agree but digging into the details of this incident:
> Note that this allegedly vengeful former employee also risked public health and safety. By editing the menus to suggest that certain items were safe for people with peanut allergies when they weren’t, he risked people having life-threatening anaphylactic incidents. There is no allegation that anyone was actually harmed or injured, however, as Disney detected the alterations before menus could be sent out to restaurants
Intent. Drunk drivers are being stupid and dangerous. This person was intentionally dangerous.
Drunk driving is also intentional
No. The intent of drunk driving is to get around. There is no malicious intent, just extreme negligence.
4 replies →
I would normally agree but digging into the details of this incident:
> Note that this allegedly vengeful former employee also risked public health and safety. By editing the menus to suggest that certain items were safe for people with peanut allergies when they weren’t, he risked people having life-threatening anaphylactic incidents. There is no allegation that anyone was actually harmed or injured, however, as Disney detected the alterations before menus could be sent out to restaurants
https://databreaches.net/2024/10/30/fbi-investigated-disney-...
A drunk driver far more directly puts people at risk than a menu with incorrect allergen information.
Fewer than 1% of allergy incidents result in death, which can't be said for drunk driver crashes.
What's up with all these strange analogies.
This would be programming a machine to print "non-alcoholic" on alcoholic beer in such an analogy about drunk drivers.
cant tell if you are a troll or a Luigi the murderer supporter.