← Back to context Comment by david-gpu 3 months ago Both of which were terrible marketing wise. 2 comments david-gpu Reply shawnz 2 months ago What makes "rebate" terrible but "dividend" good? They accomplish the same thing in my mind. In fact I think calling it a "dividend" would be a pretty unconventional and contrived usage of that word. david-gpu 2 months ago Rebate: focuses attention on the tax. Dividend: focuses attention on the income people receive.Never heard of the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend? Except that one enshrines CO2 emissions instead of curbing them.
shawnz 2 months ago What makes "rebate" terrible but "dividend" good? They accomplish the same thing in my mind. In fact I think calling it a "dividend" would be a pretty unconventional and contrived usage of that word. david-gpu 2 months ago Rebate: focuses attention on the tax. Dividend: focuses attention on the income people receive.Never heard of the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend? Except that one enshrines CO2 emissions instead of curbing them.
david-gpu 2 months ago Rebate: focuses attention on the tax. Dividend: focuses attention on the income people receive.Never heard of the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend? Except that one enshrines CO2 emissions instead of curbing them.
What makes "rebate" terrible but "dividend" good? They accomplish the same thing in my mind. In fact I think calling it a "dividend" would be a pretty unconventional and contrived usage of that word.
Rebate: focuses attention on the tax. Dividend: focuses attention on the income people receive.
Never heard of the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend? Except that one enshrines CO2 emissions instead of curbing them.