← Back to context

Comment by martin-t

1 day ago

Your argument contains multiple fallacies.

You first act as if the current situation is the best we can do by pretending that no alternative can be better by implying that any alternative is naive.

I attempt to be reasonable and explain in good faith.

Yet then you admit the current situation doesn't work while at the same time continue acting as if a solution is impossible by pretending any attempt at a solution is worse without actually giving any specific criticisms.

On top, you:

1) (Probably intentionally) misrepresent what I said - I never said I wanted a violent revolution, I warn about it.

2) Mock me.

EDIT: Oh and I just noticed you attacked another commenter for absolutely no reason[0]. I would very much like to understand your goals because without further explanation, just going by your behavior here, they seem diametrically opposed to a better society for no valid reason.

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43814782

---

If you have a constructive argument to make, I encourage you to do so.