← Back to context

Comment by onlyrealcuzzo

3 months ago

I was trying to write some documentation for a back-propagation function for something instructional I'm working on.

I sent the documentation to Gemini, who completely tore it apart on pedantism for being slightly off on a few key parts, and at the same time not being great for any audience due to the trade-offs.

Claude and Grok had similar feedback.

ChatGPT gave it a 10/10 with emojis on 2 of 3 categories and an 8.5/10 on accuracy.

Said it was "truly fantastic" in italics, too.