← Back to context Comment by camel-cdr 5 days ago How does this compare performance wise with RomuQuad and RomuDuoJr? (romu-random.org/) 1 comment camel-cdr Reply the_othernet 5 days ago Added the Romu variants to benchmark.c. Here are the current results:LoopMix128 ns/call: 0.380 nsxoroshiro128++ ns/call: 0.757 nswyrand ns/call: 0.379 nsPCG64 ns/call: 0.757 nsRomuQuad ns/call: 0.575 nsRomuDuoJr ns/call: 0.416 ns
the_othernet 5 days ago Added the Romu variants to benchmark.c. Here are the current results:LoopMix128 ns/call: 0.380 nsxoroshiro128++ ns/call: 0.757 nswyrand ns/call: 0.379 nsPCG64 ns/call: 0.757 nsRomuQuad ns/call: 0.575 nsRomuDuoJr ns/call: 0.416 ns
Added the Romu variants to benchmark.c. Here are the current results:
LoopMix128 ns/call: 0.380 ns
xoroshiro128++ ns/call: 0.757 ns
wyrand ns/call: 0.379 ns
PCG64 ns/call: 0.757 ns
RomuQuad ns/call: 0.575 ns
RomuDuoJr ns/call: 0.416 ns