← Back to context

Comment by bongodongobob

1 year ago

A laptop wins everytime because I don't have to carry around all my peripherals and set em all up again. Unless there's going to be dock setups in every conference room, coffee shop, table in my house, airplane, car, deck, etc, a laptop makes more sense.

The peripherals need not be anything more than a clamshell screen + keyboard, same as a laptop.

  • Than what do you save? Only the system-on-a-chip (CPU, GPU, RAM).

    And the hardware to get an SoC with phone-like performance in a laptop or desktop form factor is relatively cheap, just because you have so much more space and power and cooling to work with.

    (Your laptop-shell definitely needs its own power supply, whether that be a battery or a cable, because the screen alone will take more power than your phone's battery can provide for any sustained period of use.)

  • Right but if it's the same as a laptop why not just use a laptop?

    The only things I can think of are you really want to keep all the data on your phone and don't want to use cloud sync solutions (Dropbox etc.), or you really want to save a couple of hundred dollars getting a (probably terrible) laptop without a motherboard. Not very compelling IMO.

    • Surely long term it'd be cost? A screen and a keyboard in a laptop shell should be a lot cheaper that a screen, a keyboard, RAM, SSD, fans etc in a laptop shell.

      1 reply →

    • Ease of use and clamshell should be cheaper if vendor would promise 10 years of support so clamshell bought today would still work with iPhone 22.

  • Those would be the most expensive parts of the laptop. You're basically just saving on a mobile SoC which isn't much of a cost.