← Back to context Comment by ceejayoz 15 hours ago You... want to replace KYC with iris scanning stations? 3 comments ceejayoz Reply kragen 11 hours ago It has real drawbacks, but I wasn't talking about what would be a good idea; I was talking about what would be a useful measure for preventing or recovering from account compromises. Iris scanning would be; KYC isn't. coolcase 12 hours ago That is know your eye, not know your customer.Yeah I know eventually these will be linked by some data broker and will meld into the same thing.But I compare it to using a fingerprint to unlock a password manager on your phone. That ain't KYC. wmf 13 hours ago We're not allowed to say this but hashed biometrics with proof of liveness is probably the strongest authentication.
kragen 11 hours ago It has real drawbacks, but I wasn't talking about what would be a good idea; I was talking about what would be a useful measure for preventing or recovering from account compromises. Iris scanning would be; KYC isn't.
coolcase 12 hours ago That is know your eye, not know your customer.Yeah I know eventually these will be linked by some data broker and will meld into the same thing.But I compare it to using a fingerprint to unlock a password manager on your phone. That ain't KYC.
wmf 13 hours ago We're not allowed to say this but hashed biometrics with proof of liveness is probably the strongest authentication.
It has real drawbacks, but I wasn't talking about what would be a good idea; I was talking about what would be a useful measure for preventing or recovering from account compromises. Iris scanning would be; KYC isn't.
That is know your eye, not know your customer.
Yeah I know eventually these will be linked by some data broker and will meld into the same thing.
But I compare it to using a fingerprint to unlock a password manager on your phone. That ain't KYC.
We're not allowed to say this but hashed biometrics with proof of liveness is probably the strongest authentication.