Comment by jerf

That's what it means, basically. I draw a distinction between static code like C++ or Rust may generate and code like what Python may generate.

There is a middle ground of languages that box everything, but lack the rich complexity of Python or Ruby, such as Erlang, and I believe, O'Caml if you aren't semi-carefully programming for performance, that fits fairly cleanly into the middle ground between them. However compared to the uptake of static languages on the one side and the full dynamic scripting languages on the other, these are relatively speaking less common and don't get their own separate "in between" tier in my head, as it would end up being a .75-ish tier that would break the pattern. That is not to say they are bad or uninteresting, there's plenty of interesting languages there, they just aren't as popular.