← Back to context

Comment by hartator

1 day ago

Interesting that storing images is not something solved yet.

If you watch the animated gif, he is still using a third party service to store that graph.

I also think people to tend to like Markdown mostly because it’s plain text. The added benefits of that preview view is minimal. Like my gut feeling Markdown is popular 90% because of it’s in an accepted way to do plaintext and only 10% for the added formatting.

> "The added benefits of that preview view is minimal."

In relative terms you may be right... but subjectively, having grown accustomed to Obsidian's live view in editor mode, I'd have a hard time giving it up.

Obsidian can automatically ingest files and store them on disk while giving links to it. My personal vault contains many kinds of files living in the "Attachments" folder.

> Markdown is popular 90% because of it’s in an accepted way to do plaintext and only 10% for the added formatting.

For me Markdown allows me to write and format text at the speed of thought. Added bonus is that it's readable with "less xyz.md" or anything which can render text.

  • Yep. Obsidian strikes a good compromise of automatically copying attachments into a relative subfolder for the note and then linking them in the MD file:

      lotr-recipes
      lotr-recipes/manflesh.md
      lotr-recipes/media/manflesh_1.png
      lotr-recipes/media/manflesh_2.png
    

    Also makes it trivial to run a note through a static site generator and publish online.

With plaintext, it's very trivial to add a script that put images in some location and build the link to that.

Markdown is great because you can easily add structure while typing compared to other format which have a more extensive markup format. I prefer org-mode because what Markdown can do, but also more extensive capabilities if you need so, but there's not a lot of editors for it especially on mobile.

I believe tiddlywiki stores PNGs as base64 strings, so image is always there.

Yes, the file can grow large with many images, but it's a single file containing everything... even scripting!

  • Yes, it embeds all attachments as base64.

    TiddlyWiki is great until you want to add a structure to your Wiki. I was using it like mad, then I found out that linking pages took more time then writing notes, and I pulled the trigger and moved to Obsidian.

  • If you run the node.js server version it can handle images properly, as separate files. That also gives you the practical ability to use many large images and videos.