Comment by michaelmrose
12 hours ago
The downvotes are because this is unreal. You are describing hallucinations. Lots of people have them.
12 hours ago
The downvotes are because this is unreal. You are describing hallucinations. Lots of people have them.
Err no I'm not.
This article is literally about living bodies emitting light in our visible spectrum but it's a hallucination to claim to see it. Yeah right...
Downvotes are no surprise here though.
The article specifically states that this light is NOT visible to humans:
> UPE, also known as biophoton emission, is a spontaneous release of extremely low-intensity light that is invisible to the human eye and falls within the spectral range of 200–1,000 nm.
Light of those wavelenghts is not visible to humans.
Come on, this is mega basic ...
The article talks about tissue itself emitting light. By what mechanism would this light produce a "bright outline about 1cm thick"? Lamps etc. don't produce such an outline.
Downvotes is the natural allergic reaction to alien ideas. Science to many isn't just a theory equal among others, but a religion, a part of their identity that they are very defensive about. The core postulate of this religion is that everything can be reduced to concepts understandable by their minds and replicated in a mechanical experiment, or it doesn't exist. If a few dozens of people could reliably demonstrate that they see the same aura, that would be a disaster for science as a religion, because a phenomenon apparently exists, yet you can't build an aura detector. On the other hand, this defensiveness is necessary to protect the science, for if you start admitting alien ideas without their assimilation, the science will fall apart.
> If a few dozens of people could reliably demonstrate that they see the same aura, that would be a disaster for science as a religion, because a phenomenon apparently exists, yet you can't build an aura detector.
I fundamentally disagree with the idea that science is a religion to many people, but even if it was, I don't think what you said is a necessary conclusion.
If people objectively and reproducibly saw the same aura, it would allow scientists to actually study the phenomenon & try to build an aura detector. Since (AFAIK) this hasn't happened, science can't approach the topic due to the objective basis missing. But you're assuming that these auras would automatically be non-material, which doesn't seem like a fair assumption - given that we don't seem to have encountered any such thing so far.
>Downvotes are no surprise here though.
Yeah, HN has become quite hostile, no wonder why their numbers are sinking.
Also, people don't follow through arguments anymore, one reply then disappear, extremely weak strawmams, etc.
You tell people they're wrong and you get "watch your tone" back.
Sad as this used to be a great community!