← Back to context Comment by qoez 18 days ago They'll probably blame openai/the AI instead. 5 comments qoez Reply nashashmi 18 days ago AI has reproducible outcomes. If someone else can make it work, then they should too. daveguy 18 days ago This is just false. Do these models even have reproducible outcomes with a temperature of 0? Aren't they also severely restricted with a temp of 0? nashashmi 18 days ago Some randomization is intentionally introduced. We are not accounting for that. Otherwise, it should be able to give you the same information.
nashashmi 18 days ago AI has reproducible outcomes. If someone else can make it work, then they should too. daveguy 18 days ago This is just false. Do these models even have reproducible outcomes with a temperature of 0? Aren't they also severely restricted with a temp of 0? nashashmi 18 days ago Some randomization is intentionally introduced. We are not accounting for that. Otherwise, it should be able to give you the same information.
daveguy 18 days ago This is just false. Do these models even have reproducible outcomes with a temperature of 0? Aren't they also severely restricted with a temp of 0? nashashmi 18 days ago Some randomization is intentionally introduced. We are not accounting for that. Otherwise, it should be able to give you the same information.
nashashmi 18 days ago Some randomization is intentionally introduced. We are not accounting for that. Otherwise, it should be able to give you the same information.
AI has reproducible outcomes. If someone else can make it work, then they should too.
This is just false. Do these models even have reproducible outcomes with a temperature of 0? Aren't they also severely restricted with a temp of 0?
Some randomization is intentionally introduced. We are not accounting for that. Otherwise, it should be able to give you the same information.