← Back to context

Comment by seydor

9 months ago

> most of the problematic readers were not concerned if their literal translations of Bleak House were not coherent, so obvious logical errors never seemed to affect them

The inability to understand sarcasm on the internet is far worse today than it was 10 years ago, and i don't think this can be explained by the influx of larger audience, because this keeps happening in very niche communities. It's something happening globally, even in non-english countries. my guess is it has to do with the dumbing-down of popular media (the internet) to the point where words are removed and only emoji are left (which severely limits the bandwidth of conversation)

It can be hard to convey sarcasm, especially in writing, and especially when you don't know the actual stance of the person writing.

If I mention "big beautiful tariffs" in a peer group of liberals, they can assume I'm being sarcastic. If I'm posting anonymously on the internet, then who knows, maybe I genuinely reject the economic orthodoxy of Adam Smith and David Ricardo.

In this context, emoji might actually be helpful in expressing sarcasm. Big beautiful tariffs :roll_eyes:

  • Aren't emojis short-hand context that lowers reading/writing requirements though?

    I could express anything an emoji expresses strictly through words.

    But over-relying on emojis might atrophy my ability to do so, over time.