← Back to context

Comment by dgfitz

7 months ago

The sentence works without those two words. “You either work for a living or you don’t.”

Now what?

Now it comes down to how you define 'for a living'. You still need to differentiate between people who work to survive, people who work to finance their aspirational lifestyle, and people who have all the money they could possibly need and still work because they either see it as a calling or they just seem to like working. Considering all these people in the same 'class' is far too simplistic.

  • Enh, to me it’s not, either you work or you don’t.

    • So someone on the edge of poverty, balancing two or three minimum wage jobs just to make ends meet, should be considered part of the same class as the CEO of Microsoft or Google? Hell most people on the Forbes list 'work' in at least some meaning of the word, even if many of them effectively work for themselves.

      What about the trust fund kid working part time at an art gallery just because they like the scene and hanging out with artists? Same class?

      And on the flip side, are pensioners, the unemployed, and people on permanent disability part of the same class as the dilettante children of billionaires?

      6 replies →