← Back to context

Comment by calrain

5 days ago

AI is just a tool, it's no more useful than a non-complaining junior dev that constantly needs direction, but it sure can cut out a lot of repetitive work.

I am more productive using it, but that is just me.

I use ai myself as stack exchange but this sentiment is extremely common on HN where you have people trying to force ai to do things it's clearly shit for. Not to mention the rust your brain gathers by not doing these little 'mundane' things. LLMS are a useless dead end anyway all these billion dollar corpos building over it, even worse hype than crypto.

  • Without making generalisations, I'm trying to leverage LLM as much as possible to see how they can help.

    I know there is a lot of hype about LLM's and I'm genuinely interested in the niches that they can fill, and where they definitely shouldn't be involved in the software development process.

    I would say I'm an expert level programmer in the small field that I work in, and have set up development teams in the past.

    I think that is an advantage to working with integrating LLMs into a dev cycle as I have experience in providing structure with developers, something that LLMs 100% require, without a shred of doubt.

    As the capability of LLMs continues to grow, having some framework around where they are 'almost good enough' will help re-evalutate them as they improve.

    I'm not trying to prove anything to anyone else, just build a reference point for where we are now.