← Back to context Comment by immibis 3 months ago That's "just" more statistics though. 4 comments immibis Reply Flemlo 3 months ago Are you good in math definitions or is this an opinion?For me a compressed model learning rules through statistics is not statistics anymore.Physic rules are not statistics. immibis 3 months ago Of course they are. Force has a strong correlation with mass times acceleration. Objects at rest have a high chance of being observed to remain at rest. And so on. Flemlo 3 months ago Statistic is not the same as constant equations. 1 reply →
Flemlo 3 months ago Are you good in math definitions or is this an opinion?For me a compressed model learning rules through statistics is not statistics anymore.Physic rules are not statistics. immibis 3 months ago Of course they are. Force has a strong correlation with mass times acceleration. Objects at rest have a high chance of being observed to remain at rest. And so on. Flemlo 3 months ago Statistic is not the same as constant equations. 1 reply →
immibis 3 months ago Of course they are. Force has a strong correlation with mass times acceleration. Objects at rest have a high chance of being observed to remain at rest. And so on. Flemlo 3 months ago Statistic is not the same as constant equations. 1 reply →
Are you good in math definitions or is this an opinion?
For me a compressed model learning rules through statistics is not statistics anymore.
Physic rules are not statistics.
Of course they are. Force has a strong correlation with mass times acceleration. Objects at rest have a high chance of being observed to remain at rest. And so on.
Statistic is not the same as constant equations.
1 reply →