← Back to context

Comment by AstroBen

6 days ago

I've had a lot of success using LLMs to deepen my understanding of topics. Give them an argument, and have them give the best points against it. Consider them, iterate. Argue against it and let it counter. It's a really good rubber duck

> The expert skills... currently come from long experience writing code

Do they? Is it the writing that's important? Or is it the thinking that goes along with it? What's stopping someone from going through LLM output, going back and forth on design decisions with the LLM, and ultimately making the final choice of how the tool should mold the codebase after seeing the options

I mean of course this requires some proactive effort on your part.. but it always did

The key point I think though is to not outsource your thinking. You can't blindly trust the output. It's a modern search engine

I think it's the writing.

I learned long ago that I could read a book, study it, think about it. And I still would really master the material until I built with it.