← Back to context Comment by rienbdj 1 year ago It can give back code though. It might be wrong, but it won’t be ambiguous. 4 comments rienbdj Reply swiftcoder 1 year ago > It can give back code though. It might be wrong, but it won’t be ambiguous.Code is very often ambiguous (even more so in programming languages that play fast and loose with types).Relative lack of ambiguity is a very easy way to tell who on your team is a senior developer 0points 1 year ago When it don't even compile or have clear intent, it's ambiguous in my book. isolli 1 year ago The output is also often quite simple to check... rienbdj 1 year ago For images and other media, yes. Does it look right?Program correctness is incredibly difficult - arguably the biggest problem in the industry.
swiftcoder 1 year ago > It can give back code though. It might be wrong, but it won’t be ambiguous.Code is very often ambiguous (even more so in programming languages that play fast and loose with types).Relative lack of ambiguity is a very easy way to tell who on your team is a senior developer
isolli 1 year ago The output is also often quite simple to check... rienbdj 1 year ago For images and other media, yes. Does it look right?Program correctness is incredibly difficult - arguably the biggest problem in the industry.
rienbdj 1 year ago For images and other media, yes. Does it look right?Program correctness is incredibly difficult - arguably the biggest problem in the industry.
> It can give back code though. It might be wrong, but it won’t be ambiguous.
Code is very often ambiguous (even more so in programming languages that play fast and loose with types).
Relative lack of ambiguity is a very easy way to tell who on your team is a senior developer
When it don't even compile or have clear intent, it's ambiguous in my book.
The output is also often quite simple to check...
For images and other media, yes. Does it look right?
Program correctness is incredibly difficult - arguably the biggest problem in the industry.