← Back to context Comment by pca006132 6 months ago The nice thing is that a fully broken clock is accurate more often than a slightly deviated clock. 2 comments pca006132 Reply antifa 6 months ago A clock that's 5 seconds, 5 minutes, or 5 hours ahead, or counts an hour as 61 minutes, is still more useful than a clock that does not move it's hands at all. teddyh 6 months ago Only if the deviated clock is fast. If a clock is, instead, slow, it is correct more often than a stopped clock.
antifa 6 months ago A clock that's 5 seconds, 5 minutes, or 5 hours ahead, or counts an hour as 61 minutes, is still more useful than a clock that does not move it's hands at all.
teddyh 6 months ago Only if the deviated clock is fast. If a clock is, instead, slow, it is correct more often than a stopped clock.
A clock that's 5 seconds, 5 minutes, or 5 hours ahead, or counts an hour as 61 minutes, is still more useful than a clock that does not move it's hands at all.
Only if the deviated clock is fast. If a clock is, instead, slow, it is correct more often than a stopped clock.