← Back to context

Comment by tptacek

6 days ago

I don't accept the premise that "training on" and "copying" are the same thing, any more than me reading a book and learning stuff is copying from the book. But past that, I have, for the reasons stated in the piece, absolutely no patience for software developers trying to put this concern on the table. From my perspective, they've forfeited it.

> I don't accept the premise that "training on" and "copying" are the same thing...

Nor do I. Training and copying are clearly different things... and if these tools had never emitted -verbatim- nontrivial chunks of the code they'd ingested, [0] I'd be much less concerned about them. But as it stands now, some-to-many of the companies that build and deploy these machines clearly didn't care to ensure that their machines simply wouldn't plagiarize.

I've a bit more commentary that's related to whether or not what these companies are doing should be permitted here. [1]

[0] Based on what I've seen, when it happens, it is often with either incorrect copyright and/or license notifications, or none of the verbiage the license of the copied code requires in non-trivial reproductions of that code.

[1] <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44166983>

Who is this "they" who have forfeited it?

What about the millions of software developers who have never even visited a pirate site, much less built one?

Are we including the Netflix developers working actively on DRM?

How about the software developers working on anti-circumvention code for Kindle?

I'm totally perplexed at how willing you are to lump a profession of more than 20 million people all into one bucket and deny all of them, collectively, the right to say anything about IP. Are doctors not allowed to talk about the society harms of elective plastic surgery because some of them are plastic surgeons? Is anyone with an MBA not allowed to warn people against scummy business practices because many-to-most of them are involved in dreaming those practices up?

This logic makes no sense, and I have to imagine that you see that given that you're avoiding replying to me.

  • You can say whatever you'd like about IP. You just don't get to tell me how to hear it.

    • I mean, that's fine I guess? As long as you're aware that you're being totally and utterly irrational about it.