← Back to context

Comment by selcuka

5 days ago

Why not? How is this different than, say, location access, or microphone access?

I want to be able to configure this per web site, and a permission prompt is a better interface than having an allow/deny list hidden in settings.

Because users understand what “microphone access” entails. “Use WebRTC?” means nothing to the average user.

  • Fair point, but "cookies" didn't mean anything to the average user either, and "cookie consent" banners are the norm now.

    • I think very few people would argue that cookie consent banners in the form in which they are the norm are a good thing just like permission prompts for microphone access are.

  • Mobile apps require location permissions to use Bluetooth right now, even though that's a hard to understand situation for average people.

    If a feature can be used to track people, you have to flag it off or else you are just contributing to the tech Big Brother apparatus.