← Back to context Comment by Karliss 3 days ago Considering that the author considers math below his pay-grade not a huge surprise that it is wrong. 2 comments Karliss Reply frizlab 3 days ago YES! I was taken aback by that statement too. I think the opposite: in this age of AI, actually knowing things will be a huge bonus IMHO. fc417fc802 2 days ago > math below his pay-gradeCompletely backwards. Math is much more difficult than programming and LLMs still can't consistently add numbers correctly last I checked. What a strange attitude to take.
frizlab 3 days ago YES! I was taken aback by that statement too. I think the opposite: in this age of AI, actually knowing things will be a huge bonus IMHO.
fc417fc802 2 days ago > math below his pay-gradeCompletely backwards. Math is much more difficult than programming and LLMs still can't consistently add numbers correctly last I checked. What a strange attitude to take.
YES! I was taken aback by that statement too. I think the opposite: in this age of AI, actually knowing things will be a huge bonus IMHO.
> math below his pay-grade
Completely backwards. Math is much more difficult than programming and LLMs still can't consistently add numbers correctly last I checked. What a strange attitude to take.