← Back to context

Comment by cwillu

8 months ago

So we agree that the maintainer is at fault: he wanted to change things and not have to thoroughly test his changes by doing the boring work of adding test coverage to the modified area.

1 comment

cwillu

Reply
bmacho  8 months ago

There is no arguing about that, the maintainer made a mistake. (Among other people, and it was insignificant anyway.)

So now that we agree on this, what now? How exactly does

  > does not give a warm fuzzy feeling about the author of the at-fault patch leading a fork.

follow? E.g. do you think that none of the Wayland developers ever made any mistakes?