← Back to context Comment by brookst 3 days ago Writing specs 7 comments brookst Reply auggierose 2 days ago Exactly my thought. This is just natural language as a specification language. kiitos 2 days ago ...as an ambiguous and inadequately-specified specification language. auggierose 1 day ago In the end, every specification is specified via natural language, this is just where the buck stops. All math books are written in natural language, even the ones about specification languages. 4 replies →
auggierose 2 days ago Exactly my thought. This is just natural language as a specification language. kiitos 2 days ago ...as an ambiguous and inadequately-specified specification language. auggierose 1 day ago In the end, every specification is specified via natural language, this is just where the buck stops. All math books are written in natural language, even the ones about specification languages. 4 replies →
kiitos 2 days ago ...as an ambiguous and inadequately-specified specification language. auggierose 1 day ago In the end, every specification is specified via natural language, this is just where the buck stops. All math books are written in natural language, even the ones about specification languages. 4 replies →
auggierose 1 day ago In the end, every specification is specified via natural language, this is just where the buck stops. All math books are written in natural language, even the ones about specification languages. 4 replies →
Exactly my thought. This is just natural language as a specification language.
...as an ambiguous and inadequately-specified specification language.
In the end, every specification is specified via natural language, this is just where the buck stops. All math books are written in natural language, even the ones about specification languages.
4 replies →