Comment by xnx
1 day ago
I wouldn't be planning any fixes infrastructure transit programs that didn't have an ROI in the next 7 years. It will be hard for anything to compete with the efficiency of Waymo.
1 day ago
I wouldn't be planning any fixes infrastructure transit programs that didn't have an ROI in the next 7 years. It will be hard for anything to compete with the efficiency of Waymo.
Single passenger cars still have a problem with density even if there's no need for a driver. Combining multiple people into one trip can help, but also lessons the utility of Waymo if riders have to go out of their way to pick up additional passengers.
Getting 1000 people downtown could be up to 2,000 Waymo trips (one trip to drop off the worker, another trip for the car to go back out to pick up another passenger). While one of these 56 passenger very light rail cars can do it in 18 trips. A light rail vehicle like the Siemens trains used in San Francisco can carry up to 200 people at crush loads, so that's 5 trips.
Yes, I always say: Next time you see mass transit pass, imagine all those people in their own private cars on the road.
You mean it's very difficult to compete with a company that is massively subsidised by public infrastructure? That's what really killed freight rail in most of Europe, make the train companies pay for track maintance (often the rail companies even want this because it keeps competition out as well), while trucks atpapy very little of the cost they impose on the public (i.e. much higher road usage, causing most of the traffic issues).
If this were true, cities would have abandoned mass transit for taxi system decades ago. The requirement for there to be a warm body driving a taxi isn't among the prime causes of its inefficiency.
The big AV transit efficiency gains* can only happen when nearly all human drivers are removed from the road. Alas, that's at least 20 years ahead of now**, or more (e.g. if tech stalls for some reason, though I consider it unlikely). Otherwise they'd be limited by having to account for human drivers and that limits speed and throughput enough so other solutions are a must.
* Think having much higher speed limits (as far as humans are concerned, nonexistent), or mass coordinating movement over the entire traffic.
** We can reasonably estimate the minimum without bothering to ask how fast the tech will improve: Even if the tech were available now, think about fleet replacement costs which no one group would be too eager to pay. Best case, it's the typical 'make a concentrated pressure group lose for societal benefit' and we know how that politics goes. It will happen, but slowly.
*** Another thing to account for is that there's no good reason to design an AV car like a normal car, and there'll be some iteration time over that too.
Higher speeds increases noise and stopping distance, even for autonomous vehicles.
True, but this can be compensated for. Current vehicle design is based on human-operated gas vehicles - so it better be aerodynamic (to save gas), and a human needs to be in the front (to see) with only a glass to separate, and it needs a particular stopping action (again a consequence of carrying humans without enough separation). This has unfortunate implications for noise and stopping distance. Electric-powered AV can have creative designs to enable much quicker (yet safe) stopping action, an action which AV would also make rarer.
4 replies →
Each Waymo vehicle is probably close to half a million USD in just hardware cost.
I don’t think fixed route transport infrastructure is going to have trouble competing on efficiency.
The hardware costs for Waymo are estimated at $30k.
Source?
They were targeting $7.5k for their in house honeycomb lidars and they have 12 of them - that’s 90k already.
https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/27/22644370/waymo-lidar-stop...
They also aren’t close to the $7.5k target (there isn’t any public source for that so you’ll have to take my word for it).
Also $30k wouldn’t even cover the base vehicle.
4 replies →
Are you talking about raw material costs? Or is that one of these extrapolations of if we scale everything to millions of cars and realise no inefficiencies and nobody making any money in the supply chain?
10 replies →
Public transit isn’t supposed to have a financial “ROI.” Are highways expected to turn a profit from tolls?
The libertarian answer is yes highways should. Most self proclaimed libertarians refuse to go that far - if you allow for highways to not make money then transit shouldn't be held to the higher bar.
Fair, but how unprofitable should they be? -$5/passenger-mike? -$12/passenger-mile? I think we can do a lot better than the current US mass transit status quo.
In 2022, the NYC Subway budgeted about $0.75 per passenger-mile (and that was during Covid, when ridership was very low) [1]. You’re really overestimating how much public transit costs to run. Private vehicles are an extremely inefficient way to move people around, hence the cost of Uber/Lyft/taxis.
[1]: https://data.transportation.gov/Public-Transit/2022-2023-NTD...
5 replies →
It is really efficient, at sitting in traffic with all the other cars 8-/
And yet, still faster. That's the paradox of cars.
Cars are very much not faster than trams in high traffic conditions. Nevermind heavy rail.
2 replies →