← Back to context

Comment by danpalmer

1 day ago

You’re talking about trains, but this is about trams. The design constraints of building into an existing and very dense road network are complex.

I agree with much of your sentiment, and hope that the Coventry council is being challenged in these sorts of ways, but at the same time I recognise that each city is going to have quite different requirements for trams driving down the roads in its centre.

Perhaps a better push back is: why isn’t this just a better bus network?

A tram and train are the same thing. No difference at all.

There are different modes of operation that differentiate them but fundamentaly they are all trains and face the same issues

  • They operate in completely different scenarios. They’re the same shape, but they’re a different set of hardware, constraints, accessibility, need to be scheduled in a different way to account for traffic, different safety concerns, different signalling systems, different distances, different surroundings.

    Again I sorta see what you mean, but feel you’re massively over simplifying this.

  • Your comment contradicts itself.

    The second sentence is partially true: they do have different modes of operation.

    But no, they don’t face entirely the same issues. Trains should hopefully never routinely encounter cars sharing their track and they don’t have to make tight turns to follow existing roadways.

    • Modern European trams are increasingly grade-separated. See what Marco Chitti has to say about European road design.

  • Well then there's no difference between overground and underground trains. But it's pretty clear that there are different issues facing building new metro lines.