Comment by jstummbillig
21 hours ago
Note that this has very little to do with AI assisted coding; the authors of the library explicitly approved/vetted the code. So this comes down to different coders having different thoughts about what constitutes good and bad code, with some flaunting of credentials to support POVs, and nothing about that is particularly new.
The whole point of this is that people will generally put the least effort into work as they think they can get away with, and LLMs will accelerate that force. This is the future of how code will be "vetted".
It's not important whose responsbility led to mistakes, it's important to understand we're creating a responsbility gap.