← Back to context

Comment by OutOfHere

19 hours ago

This is why I have multiple LLMS review and critique my specifications document, iteratively and repeatedly so, before I have my preferred LLM code it for me. I address all important points of feedback in the specifications document. To do this iteratively and repeatedly until there are no interesting points is crucial. This really fixes 80% of the expertise issues.

Moreover, after developing the code, I have multiple LLMs critique the code, file by file, or even method by method.

When I say multiple, I mean a non-reasoning one, a reasoning large one, and a next-gen reasoning small one, preferably by multiple vendors.