← Back to context

Comment by LadyCailin

7 days ago

This is one of the main reasons I’m for licensing software engineers like civil engineers are. You know that without a license, you can’t work in the civilized world. So when your license requires you to not build the torment nexus, and some manager comes and says “build the torment nexus” then you tell them no, knowing that they can’t just fire you and hire someone else to do it. Yes, they might outsource it, but you can create regulations that say that companies that offer products in the civilized world anyways can’t offer the torment nexus as a product, and then you get a super compelling argument for preventing the torment nexus.

The plan isn’t without flaws, but nobody ever even wants to discuss, they just cut off the conversation early.

You don't want a licensing requirement in software engineering. That attempts to solve the problem in the wrong place entirely. The problem is that it's legal to build the Torment Nexus.

Licensing would raise your costs and restrict your choices, while having absolutely no effect on issues like what's being discussed here. You would just get a more expensive Torment Nexus that may or may not be slightly more secure.

Yes, they'll just outsource it. Plus, it could be argued that localhost tracking is not actually illegal in the jurisdiction where it was developed (debatable, I know.)