Nuance and complexity are a thing, but many of the GP's examples should be clearly AI labeled...
> What if they give the AI a very detailed outline, constantly ask for rewrites and are ruthless in removing any facts they're not 100% sure of if they slip in?
The whole point of those examples is to demonstrate that there is considerably diversity in opinion on how those cases "should" be classified -- which tells us that, at least in the near term, nothing useful can be expected from such a simplistic classification scheme.
Nuance and complexity are a thing, but many of the GP's examples should be clearly AI labeled...
> What if they give the AI a very detailed outline, constantly ask for rewrites and are ruthless in removing any facts they're not 100% sure of if they slip in?
The whole point of those examples is to demonstrate that there is considerably diversity in opinion on how those cases "should" be classified -- which tells us that, at least in the near term, nothing useful can be expected from such a simplistic classification scheme.