← Back to context

Comment by exceptione

5 days ago

Maybe they should look into a non-freemium business model. But that won't happen because they want to have as much personal data as possible.

- Parent talks about a paid product. If they wants to burn tokens, they are going to pay for it.

- Those phone requirements do not stop professional abusers, organized crime nor state sponsored groups. Case in point: twitter is overrun by bots, scammers and foreign info-ops swarms.

- Phone requirements might hinder non-professional abusers at best, but we are sidestepping the issue if those corporations deserve that much trust to compel regular users to sell themselves. Maybe the business model just sucks.

I don't like requiring phone numbers either, but saying OpenAI shouldn't do freemium model for hottest tech product of this century (AI) is a fundamental misunderstanding of how humans and the world works.

Also, if they don't do freemium they're getting way more valuable information about you than just a phone number.

  • What part of this thread relates to freemium? Use of the API requires tokens that are paid for. General use of the AI via the web interface does not require a phone number.

    Only requiring the phone number for API users feels needlessly invasive and is not explained by a vague "countering fraud and abuse" for a paid product...