Comment by layer8
4 days ago
These are the kinds of things I tend to write a library for over time, that takes care of the details that remain the same between use cases. Designing those is one interesting and fulfilling part of the work.
4 days ago
These are the kinds of things I tend to write a library for over time, that takes care of the details that remain the same between use cases. Designing those is one interesting and fulfilling part of the work.
That's all fine and good, but there is always boilerplate that you can't design away.
Even the most succinct cli command definition and argument parsing library you could devise is going to require a bunch of option name definition.
It's just a fool's errand to think you can stamp out everything that is tedious. It's great that we now have tools that can generate arbitrary code to bridge that gap.
There are diminishing returns for sure, and this wasn't an argument against using LLMs for the tedious parts. It was an argument that most of the existing work isn't necessarily tedious to start with.
Yeah. But I've been reorienting my sense of the proportion of the work that is tedious.