Comment by deadbabe
6 days ago
You don’t think there are? Then what do you care if masters go extinct and all masterworks are produced by AI? The end result is the same.
6 days ago
You don’t think there are? Then what do you care if masters go extinct and all masterworks are produced by AI? The end result is the same.
Give me examples please.
If you think the end state is the same, it's because you misunderstand the argument being made. Try being more curious and less fortune-cookie! Nobody said "making money from art is bad."
I have no examples.
Does that disprove your thesis that people cannot make great art (or become “true masters”) with commercial incentives?
What does this imply for your broader thesis that nothing is lost if AI destroys commercial incentive for humans to master and develop art further?
2 replies →