Not really. Asimov's story did not represent the process as a mathematically inevitable consequence of physics. It might not even have gone through a second cycle. Cellular life, dollars, and teletypes would all have had to come about again. (-:
Wow, that makes it even dumber. That idea was literally also in Genesis as the original sin of man: "You shall be as Gods."
Edit, for posting too fast: I don't consider the response below to be in good faith, for if there is a God, nothing could be more offensive than to deliberately try to knock him down a few pegs to be "plausible"; while considering the Big Bang to be "plausible" because that doesn't count as "fantasy style magic."
Not really. Asimov's story did not represent the process as a mathematically inevitable consequence of physics. It might not even have gone through a second cycle. Cellular life, dollars, and teletypes would all have had to come about again. (-:
[flagged]
You're missing the part where the robot was created by us.
Wow, that makes it even dumber. That idea was literally also in Genesis as the original sin of man: "You shall be as Gods."
Edit, for posting too fast: I don't consider the response below to be in good faith, for if there is a God, nothing could be more offensive than to deliberately try to knock him down a few pegs to be "plausible"; while considering the Big Bang to be "plausible" because that doesn't count as "fantasy style magic."
1 reply →