← Back to context Comment by layer8 4 days ago Carlo Rovelli's book is idiosyncratic, it doesn't reflect scientific consensus on the matter. 2 comments layer8 Reply asveikau 4 days ago Care to give a specific example? layer8 4 days ago It’s more a philosophical book than a physics book. I’ve only skimmed it, but it presents philosophical views that don’t reflect a scientific consensus.
asveikau 4 days ago Care to give a specific example? layer8 4 days ago It’s more a philosophical book than a physics book. I’ve only skimmed it, but it presents philosophical views that don’t reflect a scientific consensus.
layer8 4 days ago It’s more a philosophical book than a physics book. I’ve only skimmed it, but it presents philosophical views that don’t reflect a scientific consensus.
Care to give a specific example?
It’s more a philosophical book than a physics book. I’ve only skimmed it, but it presents philosophical views that don’t reflect a scientific consensus.